Demitri martin dating Adult dating sites in uae
Maliciously wounding with intent to do GBH.11y with a NPP of 8y 3m.The above offence involved an unprovoked, vicious attack upon the victim, as a result of which the victim suffered very serious injuries.PHAM, Bao Ngoc - CCA, 4.2.2005Sully, Dunford & Hidden JJCitation: R v Pham  NSWCCA 9Conviction and sentence appeal. Deceased was a wholesale drug dealer, described as being a mid-range distributor of heroin.The appellant was a retail distributor & was assisted by 3 or 4 other persons.Aged 2 months short of 18th birthday at time of offence - born in Vietnam - completed year 5 in Vietnam, then attended school in Australia & completed year 9 - not attracted to learning - family life consisted of rigid routine of work & school, little socialisation or fun - drank alcohol mainly on weekends - did not use illicit drugs - formed relationship with young woman & has a young child - below average intelligence.Whether trial miscarried - whether verdict unreasonable - rulings - directions - common enterprise - witness evidence - self-defence - provocation - motive.
There was no attempt to have the admission subsequently affirmed on video & no contemporaneous notes were made of the admission. The trial judge refused to admit evidence from a defence witness that the Crown witness told him he made a deal with police & would give false evidence against the appellants.Applicant assaulted his stepfather because of an allegation that he had sexually assaulted the applicant's sister when she was 9 years old.During the assault, applicant at one time armed himself with a mattock & at another time with an axe.Whether leave to amend indictment should have been granted - if so, whether separate trials should have been ordered.Leave to appeal against order granting leave to the Crown to amend the indictment granted but appeal refused.
Appellants were convicted of the wilful murder of a female prostitute who intended giving evidence against them in future criminal proceedings.